Article share options
Share this on
Forward this by
- Copy website website link
A Hobart court has heard there clearly was nothing sinister or untoward within the actions of a convicted rapist and killer as he joined up with numerous internet dating sites, and utilized an alias on Facebook.
- Curtis served 32 years in prison for rape, torture and murder and it is a subscribed intercourse offender
- The 64-year-old finalized as much as online dating sites and utilized an alias for Facebook while on parole
- Curtis ended up being sentenced to 3 months’ prison for breaching their community security purchase by perhaps maybe perhaps not reporting their internet activity to authorities
Jamie John Curtis had been paroled in June a year ago after serving 32 years for the duplicated rape and torture of the 19-year-old girl as well as the murder of her fiance in 1986.
Curtis is just a subscribed intercourse offender and it is regarding the Community Protection Register for life.
Among the list of conditions imposed on individuals regarding the register is they need to report any smartphones and internet reports, account names and passwords to police.
The Magistrates Court heard within days of their launch, Curtis had joined three internet dating sites — an abundance of Fish, nasty Date and Zeus — and had a Facebook account employing a name that is fake.
The facebook was used by him messenger solution to send two communications to a female he previously started dating after meeting her online.
The 64-year-old pleaded accountable when you look at the Magistrates Court in Hobart to breaching the Community Protection Order and an order that is restraining.
Curtis has been doing custody since police searched their automobile and house in October this past year — seizing their cellular phone.
He had been additionally faced with fraudulence offences but today those fees had been dismissed, after prosecutors tendered no proof.
Curtis ‘not especially able aided by the internet’
Defence attorney Fabiano Cangelosi stated Curtis had “a late 1980s comprehension of technology” and “a naive concept of you skill with a mobile”.
“He was created in 1955, jailed in 1986 and paroled year that is last” Mr Cangelosi stated.
“the consequence of which was that in 1986 as he visited prison, he knew of computers but he don’t get one … he previously extremely use that is limited of computer in jail.
“Emerging from prison he had been really an individual placing a base to the century that is 21st an awareness of technology from the 1980s. “
Mr Cangelosi stated that while Curtis had finalized to express he comprehended the conditions for the Community Protection Order and carried a duplicate of it he did not really have a practical understanding of what the internet was with him on his phone.
“He just isn’t specially able utilizing the internet, ” Mr Cangelosi stated.
He stated their customer “thought that the web had been a fixed thing” that needed a far more active procedure to interact with and ended up being “naive” in what their cellular phone could do.
Mr Cangelosi stated the alias Curtis utilized on Facebook had not been intended to avoid authorities detection, but instead because he had been mindful that he is the target of undesirable attention as a result of their previous crimes.
There is “nothing by itself untoward in what Curtis had been doing on the web sites that are dating, his lawyer stated.
Offences ‘not that serious’: magistrate
In sentencing, Magistrate Michael Daley stated he accepted the breach had been to some extent because Curtis have been in prison since 1986 and failed to completely understand the web.
“we additionally accept Mr Curtis had not been anything that is doing by having an alias on Twitter … I think many would accept that, including me personally that is additionally on Facebook, ” he stated.
“To commit these offences while on parole is severe and it’s also truly an aggravating element. “
Not surprisingly, he stated the offences had been “not that serious”, but that further offending would probably to see their face more significant imprisonment.
Mr Daley sentenced Curtis up to a jail that is three-month — backdated by half a year take into consideration the full time he had invested in jail considering that the breaches.
Curtis’ parole for their life phrase had been revoked during their amount of time in custody in which he shall have to re-apply towards the Parole Board become re-released from jail